if you get on irc i can dcc you a clip i have encoded. it's a keeper.
maybe you can host it since you have a load of bandwidth.
if you get on irc i can dcc you a clip i have encoded. it's a keeper.
maybe you can host it since you have a load of bandwidth.
The appearance of my E-mail address in any venue does not in and of itself constitute a solicitation of bulk or commercial E-mail.
IRC? What's that?
I'm going to try and install a PHP file manager on my webserver tomorrow if I rememebr (got the day off...four day weekend 4 me!)
If that fails, I'll look ya up on IRC.
Fkn 30,921 channels on GameSplooge now? WTF!?
Like I'm gonna find you in that mess...channel name please!
I only get 50 GB/month transfer BTW on my site.
High res encode (34 MB)
http://renttopwn.com/videos/hdtv/tig...t.hdtv-reg.zip
Higher res encode (78 MB)
http://renttopwn.com/videos/hdtv/tig...tv.ac3-reg.zip
The appearance of my E-mail address in any venue does not in and of itself constitute a solicitation of bulk or commercial E-mail.
Ok..I watched the videos with the one being alot more clear and less pixelated than the other. What the technical differences between the two? What am I looking at exactly?
I really need to build a PVR for myself and put an HDTV card in there.
the first link is a lower res xvid encod of an hdtv source with vbr mp3 audio
the second link is a higher res xvid encode of an hdtv source with original ac3 audio
the source was from cbs so it's 1080i and the pixellation is from the source (not xvid).
the HD transport stream for those four mins of footage (?) was about 440 MB. so you can see the advantage of compressing into xvid if you want to keep any recorded broadcasts.
you will need large hdd or setup an array if you want to record vasts amounts of HD material.
The appearance of my E-mail address in any venue does not in and of itself constitute a solicitation of bulk or commercial E-mail.
oh and you better hurry with your decision to build a pvr. i THINK july is when all HD recording hardware will be mandated to support the broadcast flag. So if you want to record anything being broadcasted OTA, now is the time to snag a card.
The appearance of my E-mail address in any venue does not in and of itself constitute a solicitation of bulk or commercial E-mail.
Reg hun, do you realize that your have red x's instead of sigs.
A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventualy die and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it
- Max Plank-
doh. i guess there went my old host. oh well.
The appearance of my E-mail address in any venue does not in and of itself constitute a solicitation of bulk or commercial E-mail.
I tried mirroring the two files, but the upload to my webserver in Atlanta kept crapping out. I'll try again later.
Last I read the broadcast flag was delayed or not going to be implemented.
Google time!
Files are now mirrored on my site and I went ahead and changed the links in Reg's post above to my site.
John Dvorak commentary: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1814163,00.aspIn a blockbuster announcement May 6, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit said that the FCC, acting as a stooge for the MPAA and Hollywood interests, overstepped its bounds by requiring that "broadcast flag" circuitry be included as a mandate in all new digital receivers as of July
EFF site: http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/003555.php
yeah just read that exact same link and was going to come back here and comment on it.
good news for all. rejoice.
The appearance of my E-mail address in any venue does not in and of itself constitute a solicitation of bulk or commercial E-mail.
Posting Permissions
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks